10 Mind-Bending Implications of the Many Worlds Theory
MIKE
FLOORWALKER
FEBRUARY 22, 2013
In quantum physics—the scientific study of the nature of
physical reality—there is plenty of room for interpretation within the realm of
what is known. The most popular mainstream interpretation, the Copenhagen
interpretation, has as one of its central tenets the concept of wave
function collapse. That is to say, every event exists as a “wave function”
which contains every possible outcome of that event, which
“collapses”—distilling into the actual outcome, once it is observed. For
example, if a room is unobserved, anything and everything that could possibly
be in that room exists in “quantum superposition”—an indeterminate state, full
of every possibility, at least until someone enters the room and observes it,
thereby collapsing the wave function and solidifying the reality.
The role of the observer has long been a source of
contention for those who disagree with the theory. The strongest competition to
this interpretation, and probably the second most popular mainstream
interpretation (meaning, a lot of incredibly smart people think it’s a sound
theory) is called the Everett interpretation after Hugh Everett, who first
proposed it in 1957. It’s known colloquially as the Many Worlds Interpretation
(MWI), because it postulates simply that the wave function never collapses; it
simply branches into its own unique world-line, resulting in every possible
outcome of every situation existing in physical reality. If you’re having a
hard time getting your head around that statement (and the fact that it’s held
to be correct by the likes of Stephen Hawking), allow
us to spell out some of the implications for you—but first, you may want to
plug your ears to hold your brains in.
10
There Is A Multiverse, An Infinite Number Of Parallel
Physical Realities
You’re probably familiar with the concept of “alternate
universes,” and if so, probably because you’ve seen it in fiction. After all,
one of the very first instances of the concept appeared in DC comics, first
touched upon in a couple of issues of Wonder Woman, but firmly established in a
1961 issue of The
Flash. The fictional “Multiverse” concept established by DC, and taken
further by Marvel, is simply the concept that there exists infinite alternate
realities, each containing separate and unique versions of their characters,
which exist outside one another and often cross over.
This is the Many Worlds
Interpretation of quantum mechanics in a nutshell (without the
crossing over, so far as we know). It states that since the wave function never
collapses, every possible outcome of any event is realized in a separate and
non-communicating physical reality, which actually exists alongside our own. It
is interesting to note that this seemingly coincidental use of alternate
realities, perfectly describing MWI, was put forth in a fictional medium just
four years after Everett’s initial proposal of the interpretation. If MWI is
correct, it is certainly not a coincidence—for fiction may be more than just
made-up stories, as we’ll see later.
At any rate, this means that there is a version of you whose
car broke down this morning, forcing you to take the bus (or, if that happened
this morning, then vice versa). There’s also a version of you who was attacked
by a dive-bombing kamikaze bald eagle, for this doesn’t just apply to mundane
stuff; as a necessary consequence of Many Worlds, it must hold that…
9
Highly Unusual, Unlikely Events Must Happen
Let’s consider an NFL football game being played. Assume
that every time the quarterback throws the ball, there is a gigantic invisible
die being rolled, a die which contains an infinite amount of values. The most
common, likely outcomes—receiver catches the ball and scores, catches the ball
but gets tackled, ball is intercepted, and so on—are assigned to a very high
number, perhaps billions, of values. Very unlikely outcomes—say, the ball
bounces off of the sole of the sprinting receiver’s shoe as he is hit by a
linebacker, is barely scooped up off the turf by a running back, who somehow
eludes all the tacklers and scores—are assigned to a low number of values. But
crucially, they are still assigned.
MWI concludes that all values are rolled in
some timeline somewhere, even the most unlikely ones—and inevitably, the
timeline where the low-probability value gets rolled will be ours. As evidenced
by the play described above, which totally
happened and decided the outcome of a divisional playoff game.
And there is no ceiling of improbability, other than physics—whatever could possibly occur.
And there is no ceiling of improbability, other than physics—whatever could possibly occur.
We have no way of knowing whether or not even those physical
laws remain consistent across all possible world-lines, because we
unfortunately can’t communicate with or visit them to ask. So even when
confronted with circumstances that appear to be impossible, like a glowing ball
of light that shoots
fireballs at a police helicopter, or a missing woman unknowingly standing
in the background of a photo being taken of her family for a newspaper
story about her disappearance, it helps to remember that nothing is
impossible on a large enough scale—indeed, given an infinite number of chances,
literally anything you can imagine is not only possible, but inevitable. And
just as inevitably, the impossible or unimaginable—given billions upon billions
of chances—will happen here in our world-line. Which leads to a
couple of interesting observations about human nature…
8
You Have Done And/Or Will Do Everything You Could Ever
Conceive Of
If you find it impossible to imagine a man inexplicably
killing a bunch of people for no reason, or someone surviving injuries that
would destroy
a normal person five times over, or a pilot managing to land an
airplane with all controls restricted or
disabled without incurring any major injuries, you may be finding it a
little less impossible now—considering what we know about how probability works
in a Multiverse. But as soon as we begin to apply this to ourselves personally,
the implications threaten to become overwhelming; for there are billions of
versions of you—all of which are undeniably you—but many of which are very,
very different from the “you” of this world-line.
The differences between those versions are as staggering and
vast as your imagination, and the reality of their existence forces us to
examine human nature a bit differently. Of course, you would never kill anybody
(we hope), but have you ever thought about it? There is a world-line where you
did. In fact, there’s a world-line where you’re the worst mass murderer ever.
Conversely, there’s another where your tireless efforts and dedication to the
cause brought about world peace. Did you have a band in high school? That band
is the dominant musical force on the planet, somewhere. Have you always kind of
wondered what would have happened had you mustered the guts to ask out that one
girl or guy that one time? Well, you get the idea.
This could actually explain a lot: strong feelings of deja
vu, feelings of a close connection with someone you’ve never met, morbid
fascinations with things that should repulse us, or even instances of people
acting strongly “out of character” in our own worldline. For as we will see,
some may have a degree of “resonance” with other world-lines or versions of
themselves, which can bring about the knowledge that:
7
You’re No Different From Anyone
Hinduism, along with some other schools of religious and
philosophical thought, teaches the concept of reincarnation—that we as human
beings manifest physically on Earth multiple times, that we can learn from our
past and future “lives,” and that such learning is in fact the purpose of our
existence. This belief system can be seen as an intuitive understanding of the
Multiverse; and given our previous assertion about you being a mass murderer,
it can be comforting to know that the experience of all facets
of human nature is an explicit part of our growth.
Of course, this is not to say that anyone should kill people
or engage in any other immoral behaviour—after all, the purpose of this
continued cycle of learning (according to Hindu belief) is to eventually learn
all that there is to learn, and transcend our physical
existence. Ideally, we learned many lifetimes (world-lines) ago all there was
to learn from indulging the dark side of our nature.
But the kicker here is that our experience is our experience (an idea we’ll get to in a little more detail shortly)—and that all of human experience must be realized by every one of us before we can move on to wherever it is we’re moving on to.
But the kicker here is that our experience is our experience (an idea we’ll get to in a little more detail shortly)—and that all of human experience must be realized by every one of us before we can move on to wherever it is we’re moving on to.
While some believe that our destination is a type of
eventual godhood, wherein we all get to preside over a universe of our own
creation, others believe that the cycle simply repeats—that once everything
runs down and heat
death results in the destruction of all realities, our accumulated
knowledge will be used to restart the cycle and create the next Multiverse.
Which, of course, means that…
6
All Of This May Have Happened Before (And May Happen Again)
If reality is a continuous cycle—along the lines of “Big
Bang, expansion, contraction, collapse, Big Bang again”—then, given what we
believe about the Multiverse and its infinite world-lines, you have existed
before. In fact, all the infinite versions of you have existed before, and will
exist again—and the same goes for all of us, along with every possible idea,
creation and situation throughout all of our past and future, across all
realities.
In one fell swoop, this concept explains instances of both
deja vu and strong feelings of predestination. Even if deja vu seems
meaningless and random, and the premonition turns out to be incorrect, these
things are only true of our particular world-line—and it appears that some
people (or all people, just to varying degrees) are able to
achieve some degree of “resonance” with alternate world-lines—another concept
that first appeared in comic books.
Indeed, one of the more common forms of deja vu involves
experiencing an event which we recognize from having previously dreamed it.
While seen by some as precognition, this really suggests resonance with
alternate (or identical but previous) world-lines—especially when you consider
that the “dream
world” may be seen as an alternate world-line itself, and one just as
real as the waking world.
Of course, if everything that exists or will exist has already existed,
this leads to the conclusion that…
5
There Are No New Stories, Songs, Events Or Anything Else
Many writers of stories, songs and other
artistic types describe a feeling of the pieces that they craft already
existing, fully formed, waiting for the artist to come along and excavate them
like fossils. In an infinite Multiverse, this makes perfect sense, for this is
exactly what the pieces are.
Art is a uniquely human endeavour, and one that strives to
communicate aspects of the human experience that may be difficult or impossible
to communicate by other means. While it is not possible to accurately describe
in any language what love “feels
like,” there are plenty of ways to communicate this in art—indeed, it
is through artistic expressions that resonate with us (that word again) that
many of us develop our first notions of the nature of love—and that’s only one
example. How should it be possible for an artist to communicate effectively,
through a story, song or painting, an emotion that the reader, listener or
observer has never felt before?
In our Multiverse, this is explained by the fact that these
expressions of human emotion, thought, and perspective have essentially always
existed, for as long as the impulses that spawned them have existed. This very
piece of writing, which has been written before in order to guide another
version of you to knowledge that you already have, can stand as a perfect
example.
For that matter, consider the possibility that stories
aren’t just stories. The Marvel Comics Multiverse acknowledges the existence of
our world-line, one where superheroes don’t exist but are merely stories in
books and movies. It could very well be that—since physical laws may be very
different in other world-lines—these are not stories at all, but actual people
and events transcribed from other realities. This goes for anything ever
“imagined” or “created”—there exist world-lines where Hogwarts School and Harry
Potter, Camp Crystal Lake and Jason Voorhees, Gotham City and Batman, all exist
in physical reality.
And if you’re thinking that this line of
reasoning—everything exists, nothing is ever created—implies that nothing is
ever destroyed, well:
4
You Are Technically Immortal
That is exactly what it implies. The fact of our immortality
in a Multiverse can be illustrated in various ways. For one thing, the First
Law of Thermodynamics states that energy (such as the electrical
charges generated by your brain, or the heat your body produces) cannot be
created or destroyed, but simply changes form—implying that the energy that
powers your body must go somewhere when it leaves, and that consciousness
cannot be destroyed, but is infinite. For another, consider the thought
experiment known as Quantum Immortality.
In this experiment (preceded by “thought” for a reason; for crying out loud, don’t try this), an experimenter sits in front of a device which is programmed, with 50/50 probability, to either discharge a device which kills the experimenter, or produce a click (in which case, of course, the experimenter survives). In the second case, the experimenter and all observers experience the same outcome- a click, and nothing else. But in the first—since (assuming MWI is correct) it is not possible for the experimenter to experience termination of consciousness (because consciousness is infinite)—while any observers will see the experimenter killed, the experimenter himself will experience the first outcome, the harmless click, on another world-line. Said experimenter can never experience a different outcome, and thus—no matter how unlikely it becomes after repeated attempts—will always survive the experiment, from his point of view.
In this experiment (preceded by “thought” for a reason; for crying out loud, don’t try this), an experimenter sits in front of a device which is programmed, with 50/50 probability, to either discharge a device which kills the experimenter, or produce a click (in which case, of course, the experimenter survives). In the second case, the experimenter and all observers experience the same outcome- a click, and nothing else. But in the first—since (assuming MWI is correct) it is not possible for the experimenter to experience termination of consciousness (because consciousness is infinite)—while any observers will see the experimenter killed, the experimenter himself will experience the first outcome, the harmless click, on another world-line. Said experimenter can never experience a different outcome, and thus—no matter how unlikely it becomes after repeated attempts—will always survive the experiment, from his point of view.
This means that while we will all experience dying, we will
never experience death—the termination of our consciousness. How can this be?
It calls into question the very nature of consciousness, which leads us to the
very real possibility that…
3
We Are A Projection Of Ourselves
In the late 1970s, physicist David Bohm formulated a theory
describing what he called the Implicate
and Explicate orders of existence. This theory, which is consistent with
MWI, states that there is an enfolded or “Implicate” order of existence which
encapsulates all of consciousness, and that there is a corresponding
“Explicate” order of existence which comprises all that we physically see and
experience, and is the projection of the enfolded “Implicate” order.
Bohm arrived at the controversial conclusion (along with
physicist Karl Pribram, who arrived at the same conclusion independently) that
the entirety of observable existence is basically the mother of all holograms.
Just as a laser filtered through an encoded film produces a hologram, our
collective energy of the implicate order (the laser) filtered through our human
consciousness (the film) produces the explicate, physical reality (hologram).
Michael Talbot’s excellent book The
Holographic Universe examines this and many other aspects of Bohm and
Pribram’s theories in detail, but the overarching and inescapable
conclusion—which you have likely already drawn yourself—is that:
2
We Collectively Create Physical Reality
If the Explicate is but a “projection” of the Implicate,
then we—our physical selves, and indeed all of physical reality—are a
“projection” of our true, unfiltered consciousness. One that we all play a hand
in creating, whether we know it or not, all the time.
This one notion explains practically everything that “can’t
be explained” about the world we see. Supernatural phenomena, meaningful coincidences,
psychic activity—literally anything and everything makes sense when one
realizes that this reality is essentially a dream, dreamed by the most powerful
consciousness imaginable.
If this is the true nature of physical reality—as suggested
for centuries by Hindu scholars, intuited by generations of artists and
philosophers, and articulated as well as possible by our most brilliant
scientific minds—then there is only one statement left to be made. Probably not
coincidentally, one that was made previously as a seemingly throwaway lyric in
a 1967 song, by one of our greatest artists…
Nothing Is Real
Throughout the history of artistic and philosophical
expression, one concept rises to the surface, especially in works that are
particularly influential or have a great deal of longevity. From “Strawberry
Fields Forever” to Chinese philosopher Zhuangzi’s butterfly
dream, to Descartes’ assertion that “I think, therefore I am” to
Bill Hicks’ great “Life
Is A Ride” speech, and even in children’s
nursery rhymes—life is but a dream. A powerful dream, and one containing an
infinite number of lessons for us—but a dream nonetheless.
After all, if everything—Atlantis, Luke Skywalker, your neighbour
Bill—is as real as everything else, then what is reality but
what we perceive? And what is our perception, if not our creation?
I know that we have to process a lot here, but do keep in
mind that there are almost certainly billions of versions of you mulling over
the answer to this question; and that given billions of chances to find the
answer, one of your versions eventually will—as will we all.
Mike Floorwalker's actual name is Jason, and he lives in the
Boulder, Colorado area with his wife Stacey. He enjoys loud rock music, cooking
and making lists.
No comments:
Post a Comment